Saturday, March 31, 2012

Researchers have found the wild orgy gene


Ménage à trois? Wild orgies? One night stands? Who says science can't be sexy?

Certainly not Binghamton University researchers, who are hard at work uncovering the sultry secrets behind human sexual behavior.

The team - led by Dr. Justin Garcia - recently identified a dopamine receptor gene known as DRD4 that is purportedly linked to chronic infidelity and "uncommitted" one-night stands.

And wouldn't you know it?

The very same gene has already been linked to alcoholism, gambling addiction and a predilection for really bad horror movies.

Oddly enough, another study claimed the mysterious gene was responsible for political liberalism, along with "openness" to new social situations.

"What we found was that individuals with a certain variant of the DRD4 gene were more likely to have a history of uncommitted sex, including one-night stands and acts of infidelity," Garcia confirmed.

"The motivation seems to stem from a system of pleasure and reward, which is where the release of dopamine comes in. In cases of uncommitted sex, the risks are high, the rewards substantial and the motivation variable - all elements that ensure a dopamine 'rush.'"

Garcia also noted that individuals carrying the "thrill-seeking" gene were twice as likely to have a history of one-night stands as those without the variant.

"[Still], the study doesn't let transgressors off the hook. These relationships are associative, which means that not everyone with this genotype will have one-night stands or commit infidelity.

"Indeed, many people without this genotype still have one-night stands and commit infidelity. The study merely suggests that a much higher proportion of those with this genetic type are likely to engage in these behaviors," he added.







.
.
.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

British firm advertises for female web coders



Now here's a dream job. An advertisement has appeared on the UK version of Craigslist looking for female web coders who are prepared to work in the nude.

Chris Taylor of Nude House says he's a naturist himself, and that the office is warm and private - and great fun. Customers never meet the staff, he promises, and won't know they're in their birthday suits.

On the company website, he says it's the "ultimate experience for nudist self-expressions" and  suggests that "The company may also operate the other nude activities - if the staff desire."

His requirements are simple. "There is nothing hard with this other than understanding the web and being able to design web pages," reads the ad. "You can work part-time or full-time - it is up to you."

But there is just one more thing that applicants apparently need for the job - breasts.

Taylor is remarkably unabashed about the stipulation, which he seems to think is perfectly normal. "It's because they'll be working for me in my house, and I want females," he told News Agency. "I don't want to look at men."

Somehow, though, I don't think I've got the job.







.
.
.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Kajal Aggarwal is Furious

‘I NEVER POSED TOPLESS’

Kajal Aggarwal who was in the news recently for a topless photo-shoot for a magazine, says the photos were altered ~ Srinivasa Ramanujam

Kajal Aggarwal is furious. The recent buzz that she had gone topless for a photoshoot for a men’s magazine has irked the actor. Kajal claims that the picture was distorted and she says, “I shot for the magazine, but not this way. They have photo-shopped the picture and changed it.”

The peeved actor says that she had never posed topless for the shoot. “I was wearing a black tube top while shooting. In fact, I still have the pictures that I shot in the tube top, which they sent for my approval. Moreover, I did not give them an interview,” she clarifies. Kajal is supposed to have said that she would never wear a bikini or do a kissing scene in the interview for the mag.

Kajal, who is currently shooting for the Tamil film Maatran, is upset with the final outcome of the pictures and the story. “I’m not the kind of person who would ever do a topless shoot. My reputation and work stands by me. Publishing a distorted version of the photo is wrong and unethical,” she states. The actor signs off by saying, “My team will take this up with the magazine.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.
.